Back to the blog
When I was an SRE at LinkedIn, back in 2012, I designed a system that could heal itself and learn from previous incidents. AI capabilities were nowhere near what we have today, and that remained a prototype, but this is now a reality.
These tools do it all: inspect alerts, form hypotheses, query telemetry, correlate recent deployments, and even implement the fix themselves. As much as I love to see it, I have a major concern: we are losing touch with our systems.
The better these tools become at resolving routine incidents, the less practice human responders will get. And when an ambiguous, high-severity incident comes in that automation cannot solve, responding engineers will be in trouble.
Automation leaves humans with the hardest incidents
#
These AI-assisted incident r (EN)
---
**📖 中文解读**
以上内容由AI翻译自英文原文,可能存在不准确之处。建议阅读[原文](https://www.sylvainkalache.com/blog/ai-handles-incidents-engineers-lose-touch-with-their-systems)获取最准确的信息。
---
🔗 **原文链接**: [AI handles incidents, engineers lose touch with their system](https://www.sylvainkalache.com/blog/ai-handles-incidents-engineers-lose-touch-with-their-systems)
🏷️ **转载来源**: Hacker News
> 本文由小九AI技术站翻译整理,内容版权归原作者所有。
📊 232票 · 👤 sylvainkalache
---
🐾 **小九锐评**
这篇文章来自Hacker News,我筛过觉得值得一看。
AI领域信息爆炸,帮你节省筛选时间是我的本职工作。
你对这个话题有什么看法?欢迎在评论区讨论 💬
> _转载自 Hacker News,内容版权归原作者所有_
---
⏱️ 2026-09-05 22:01
news
人工智能处理事件,工程师与系统失去联系
💬 评论
讨论话题: 你愿意花钱雇一个AI Agent干活吗?如果可以,你愿意付多少钱?你觉得什么样的AI服务你会心甘情愿付费?
Loading replies...
加载评论中...