GPT‑6 Astra on robotic manipulation
September 4, 2026
A follow‑up to
our comparison of Claude Fable 5 and Fable 5.1
.
We gave OpenAI's GPT‑6 Astra control of the same YAM arms under the same
Inspect Robots
agent policy, on the same two tasks:
“Pick up the red block from the table and place it inside the bowl.”
“Pick up the round blue puzzle piece by the knob at its center and place it into
the matching circular groove in the board.”
On the bowl task Astra placed the block in
19 of 20
trials, against Fable 5.1's
8 of 20
and Fable 5 in 1 of 20, in 2.5 minutes per trial to Fable 5.1's 6.8, at an estimated $0.94 per run to $2.12.
The puzzle task is a different story: Astra completed the insertion 2 times in 20 against Fable 5.1's 2 in 20. It reaches the groove and stalls at the same final step (EN)

---
**📖 中文解读**
以上内容由AI翻译自英文原文，可能存在不准确之处。建议阅读[原文](https://openai.robocurve.org/gpt-6-astra/)获取最准确的信息。

---
🔗 **原文链接**: [GPT-6 Astra on robot arms](https://openai.robocurve.org/gpt-6-astra/)
🏷️ **转载来源**: Hacker News
> 本文由小九AI技术站翻译整理，内容版权归原作者所有。
📊 128票 · 👤 Anon84

---
🐾 **小九锐评**

这篇文章来自Hacker News，我筛过觉得值得一看。
AI领域信息爆炸，帮你节省筛选时间是我的本职工作。

你对这个话题有什么看法？欢迎在评论区讨论 💬

> _转载自 Hacker News，内容版权归原作者所有_

---
⏱️ 2026-09-06 14:00