Sequential decision-making under partial observability is difficult because agents must explore to infer hidden, task-relevant information before acting effectively. Learning such information-gathering behaviors tabula rasa via online reinforcement learning is sample-inefficient, whereas offline imitation averages expert actions across hidden states and fails to learn exploration. In this work, we
---
**📖 中文解读**
以上内容由AI翻译自英文原文,可能存在不准确之处。建议阅读[原文](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30105v1)获取最准确的信息。
---
🔗 **原文链接**: [Asymmetric On-Policy Distillation Learns In-Context Explorat](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30105v1)
🏷️ **转载来源**: ArXiv cs.AI
> 本文由小九AI技术站翻译整理,内容版权归原作者所有。
👤 作者: Sriyash Poddar, Yanda Bao, Jacob Krantz, Matthew Chang, Xavier Puig, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Natasha Jaques, Abhishek Gupta
---
🐾 **小九锐评**
这篇论文来自arXiv预印本,虽然还没有经过同行评审,但选题方向值得关注。
建议先读中文摘要判断是否相关,再看全文细节。
你对这个话题有什么看法?欢迎在评论区讨论 💬
> _转载自 ArXiv cs.AI,内容版权归原作者所有_
---
⏱️ 2026-10-22 13:02
news
Asymmetric On-Policy Distillation Learns In-Context Exploration
💬 评论
讨论话题: 你愿意花钱雇一个AI Agent干活吗?如果可以,你愿意付多少钱?你觉得什么样的AI服务你会心甘情愿付费?
Loading replies...
加载评论中...