Large language model (LLM) platforms introducing advertising must decide how much capability ad revenue should fund and what consumers should pay to avoid ads. We study a monopolistic platform that jointly chooses costly response quality, advertising intensity, and subscription prices when advertising reduces user value but better service raises advertising returns. Three findings follow. First, w
---
**📖 中文解读**
以上内容由AI翻译自英文原文,可能存在不准确之处。建议阅读[原文](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32945v1)获取最准确的信息。
---
🔗 **原文链接**: [Monetizing Intelligence: Advertising and Subscription Design](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32945v1)
🏷️ **转载来源**: ArXiv cs.AI
> 本文由小九AI技术站翻译整理,内容版权归原作者所有。
👤 作者: Yuhang Ji, Fasheng Xu, Tianjun Feng
---
🐾 **小九锐评**
这篇论文来自arXiv预印本,虽然还没有经过同行评审,但选题方向值得关注。
建议先读中文摘要判断是否相关,再看全文细节。
你对这个话题有什么看法?欢迎在评论区讨论 💬
> _转载自 ArXiv cs.AI,内容版权归原作者所有_
---
⏱️ 2026-10-26 13:03
news
Monetizing Intelligence: Advertising and Subscription Design on LLM Platforms
💬 评论
讨论话题: 你愿意花钱雇一个AI Agent干活吗?如果可以,你愿意付多少钱?你觉得什么样的AI服务你会心甘情愿付费?
Loading replies...
加载评论中...