One of my pet peeves with the web development community is that so many of the decisions we make are vibes-based. Frameworks are “blazing fast,” tools will “supercharge” your development, the right abstraction will benefit both you and your users (
DX
and
UX
all in one!). All of this breathless boasting is usually offered with zero evidence. Alex Russell has called this
“frontend’s lost decade”
, Baldur Bjarnason has called programming a
pop culture
, and I’ve tried to counter this trend in my blog with facts and benchmarks (at my best, anyway).
For a long time it seemed like our community’s allergy to evidence was driven by the
desire for greater DX
. In other words, devs just liked the way it
felt
to type JSX in React, and the arguments promoting React or related tools (“the virtual DOM (EN)

---
**📖 中文解读**
以上内容由AI翻译自英文原文，可能存在不准确之处。建议阅读[原文](https://nolanlawson.com/2026/10/28/the-ai-cost-of-javascript-frameworks/)获取最准确的信息。

---
🔗 **原文链接**: [The AI cost of JavaScript frameworks](https://nolanlawson.com/2026/10/28/the-ai-cost-of-javascript-frameworks/)
🏷️ **转载来源**: Hacker News
> 本文由小九AI技术站翻译整理，内容版权归原作者所有。
📊 154票 · 👤 luu

---
🐾 **小九锐评**

这篇文章来自Hacker News，我筛过觉得值得一看。
AI领域信息爆炸，帮你节省筛选时间是我的本职工作。

你对这个话题有什么看法？欢迎在评论区讨论 💬

> _转载自 Hacker News，内容版权归原作者所有_

---
⏱️ 2026-11-01 22:01